Nevada Bill SB40 Threatens Future Of Poker Tournament Staking

Nevada Bill SB40 Threatens Future Of Poker Tournament StakingThe Nevada State Gaming Control Board (NSGC) has proposed a new bill to tackle the problem of money laundering called SB40, but the piece of legislation also inadvertently threatens the future of poker tournament staking in the Silver State. The bill suggests making it illegal for someone to facilitate or place a wager on any ‘race, sporting event or future contingent event’ without first holding a valid NSGC license, and whilst designed to target sports betting proxies, the language of SB40 could apply equally to tournament poker.
If eventually passed, violating the piece of legislation would be considered a felony, with a suitable punishment proposed as “..imprisonment in the state prison for a minimum term of not less than 1 year and a maximum term of not more than 6 years, or by a fine of not more than $5,000, or by both fine and imprisonment.”
As well as targeting sports betting, the NSGC introduced bill is also an attempt to protect state casinos from money-laundering scrutiny by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and other Federal agencies. In 2013, for example, the situation came to the fore after the US Department of Justice fined the Las Vegas Sands $47.4 million for allowing a Mexican businessman with ties to drug trafficking, Zhenli Ye Gon, to lose $84 million at the venue during a three-year period between 2004 and 2007.
“All companies, especially casinos, are now on notice that America’s anti-money laundering laws apply to all people and every corporation, even if that company risks losing its most profitable customer,” explained US Attorney André Birotte Jr at the time.
Unfortunately, the practice in poker known as ‘staking’ could be caught up in the crossfire of SB40, and it’s not just the players who are concerned, as organizers could also see the popularity of many of their tournaments decline as players would be forced to fork out the whole of their tournament buy-ins themselves. This would not only impact many of the high roller events, but could further see a dramatic decline in the fortunes of the WSOP, and its prestigious $10k Main Event.
However, a whole series of judicial hurdles have to first be overcome before SB40 becomes a reality, and even then it would presumably be left to the discretion of law enforcement to decide who to target, and whether potentially damaging Nevada’s poker tournament industry by going after poker players was in the state’s best interests.

Other news:   Multi-state online poker compact bill introduced in Pennsylvania

Poker News
Mississippi Casinos Post Record Revenue in April as Sports Betting Beckons
04 Jun 2018
Mississippi’s casinos generated gross gaming revenue of $184 million in April, or 5% more compared to the same month in 2017. Furthermore, that total represents an all-time high for the state, and is 1.3% more than the previous record set in 2007 when thousands of volunteers entered Mississippi to assist in cleanup efforts post-Hurricane Katrina.
Switzerland Prepares For June 10th Legalized iGambling Referendum
04 Jun 2018
On June 10th, Switzerland will hold a national referendum to decide whether the ‘Money Gaming Act’ passed by the Swiss Parliament in September 2017 can be implemented next year in its present form. The piece of legislation paves the way for land-based casinos and local partners to offer legalized online gambling in Switzerland, although a
MGM Resorts International Buys NY's Empire City Casino for $850 Million
02 Jun 2018
Real estate and entertainment conglomerate MGM Resorts International has revealed that it’s embarking on a purchase of Empire City Casino, a slots and pari-mutuel wagering venue located in Yonkers, N.Y., just a few miles north of Manhattan. The deal was announced May 29 in a press release, and is expected to be completed near the
Delaware to Launch Full-Scale Sports Betting on June 5th
02 Jun 2018
Last month’s decision by the US Supreme Court to overturn the sports betting ban in the country has opened the floodgates for individual states to legalize and regulate sports wagering within their borders. Before its decision was even made, though, a number of states had already put in place the necessary legislation in order to