PPA Fighting Hard To Defeat Adelson's Internet Gambling Control Act

PPA Fighting Hard To Defeat Adelson's Internet Gambling Control ActUS interest group, the Poker Players Alliance (PPA), has been working hard to defeat Sheldon Adelson’s latest anti-online poker drive to support a federal ban on online poker. The billionaire Las Vegas Sands CEO intends to amend The Interstate Wire Act of 1961 to include online poker and online casino games, and so has introduced his drafted bill, the Internet Gambling Control Act.
Although Adelson’s bill has not yet gained sponsorship in the US Congress, it has already received support from three state Attorney Generals, and so the Poker Players Alliance is therefore seeking to halt the letter before it gains too much momentum. As PPA executive director John Pappas (photo), explains:
“We’re working overtime to make sure the letters don’t gain momentum among state AGs. We understand 10 have signed already, and we’re hoping we can change their minds as well. It’s an odd thing for a state AG to support. Essentially, it’s asking Congress to do a federal power grab on states, telling them what they can and cannot authorize. Either AGs are being misled or they don’t care what the message is, they’re just going to go along with this because they’re being asked by Sheldon Adelson.”
The three state Attorney Generals supporting Adelson’s Internet Gambling Control Act are Alan Wilson of South Carolina, Jon Bruning of Nebraska, and Chris Koster of Missouri. Also adding their signatures to the letter are Tom Horne of Arizona, David Louie of Hawaii, Bill Schuette of Michigan, Tim Fox of Montana, Wayne Stenehjem of North Dakota, Marty Jackley of South Dakota and Peter Michael of Wyoming.
Although attorney generals are not actually lawmakers and therefore do not have the power to change state laws, it should be noted that when the 2006 UIGEA was passed it was supported by almost all state Attorney Generals and so the PPA are now aggressively working to prevent a repeat of the events that led up to the controversial online poker ban.
“We want them to earn every inch they try to get in this fight. We don’t want them to push any effort that goes unchallenged. Since this is the launch of their campaign, we want to make sure it comes hard-fought,” commented Pappas.
PPA executive director John Pappas also drew attention to the fact that the Attorney Generals who have already signed the letter do not represent the most populous states in the US, and so would have less to gain from a regulated online poker industry.

Poker News
Mississippi Casinos Post Record Revenue in April as Sports Betting Beckons
04 Jun 2018
Mississippi’s casinos generated gross gaming revenue of $184 million in April, or 5% more compared to the same month in 2017. Furthermore, that total represents an all-time high for the state, and is 1.3% more than the previous record set in 2007 when thousands of volunteers entered Mississippi to assist in cleanup efforts post-Hurricane Katrina.
Switzerland Prepares For June 10th Legalized iGambling Referendum
04 Jun 2018
On June 10th, Switzerland will hold a national referendum to decide whether the ‘Money Gaming Act’ passed by the Swiss Parliament in September 2017 can be implemented next year in its present form. The piece of legislation paves the way for land-based casinos and local partners to offer legalized online gambling in Switzerland, although a
MGM Resorts International Buys NY's Empire City Casino for $850 Million
02 Jun 2018
Real estate and entertainment conglomerate MGM Resorts International has revealed that it’s embarking on a purchase of Empire City Casino, a slots and pari-mutuel wagering venue located in Yonkers, N.Y., just a few miles north of Manhattan. The deal was announced May 29 in a press release, and is expected to be completed near the
Delaware to Launch Full-Scale Sports Betting on June 5th
02 Jun 2018
Last month’s decision by the US Supreme Court to overturn the sports betting ban in the country has opened the floodgates for individual states to legalize and regulate sports wagering within their borders. Before its decision was even made, though, a number of states had already put in place the necessary legislation in order to