Supreme Court to Hear PASPA Case on December 4th

Supreme Court to Hear PASPA Case on December 4thIn 2013, the New Jersey US Circuit Court of Appeals shot down the state’s challenge to the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a federal law that since 1992 has allowed Nevada, as well as Oregon, Delaware, and Montana to offer legal sports betting in the country. On December 4th, however, New Jersey will have its case reviewed by the US Supreme Court, with a positive outcome opening the flood gates for other states to legalize their own sports betting industries, and potentially reap millions of dollars in extra revenues.
Once the US Supreme Court hears the arguments, a discussion will subsequently take place behind closed doors, and should a majority decision be reached, with at least 5 of the 9 justices ruling in favor of New Jersey, then the state would have finally successfully concluded a process which started after NJ State Senator Raymond Lesniak filed his initial lawsuit in the US District Court for the District of New Jersey back in March of 2009.
One important aspect of the Garden State’s legal fight relates to the 10th Amendment, which states that “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” Encouragingly, over the past four decades several decisions taken by the Supreme Court have held up the amendment as being designed to limit, and not increase, the federal government’s ability to “commandeer” a state’s legislative process.
It would also appear that the country as a whole has developed an increasing appetite to see sports betting legalized, too, with a poll carried out by the University of Massachusetts and The Washington Post finding that 55% of participants were in favor of either amending or repealing te federal PASPA law.
According to a study produced by Eilers & Krejcik Gaming, a win by New Jersey would likely see up to 32 states then legalize their own sports betting markets within a 5 year period, with a newly legalized market generating around $6 billion each year by the year 2022. Commenting on the case earlier this year, the American Gaming Association (AGA) Director of Media Relations, Steve Doty stated:
“This law continues to fail and is driving a $150 billion illegal sports betting market. AGA remains confident sports fans will have a legalised, regulated sports market to safely wager in within the coming years. We look forward to the court’s decision.”

Poker News
Mississippi Casinos Post Record Revenue in April as Sports Betting Beckons
04 Jun 2018
Mississippi’s casinos generated gross gaming revenue of $184 million in April, or 5% more compared to the same month in 2017. Furthermore, that total represents an all-time high for the state, and is 1.3% more than the previous record set in 2007 when thousands of volunteers entered Mississippi to assist in cleanup efforts post-Hurricane Katrina.
Switzerland Prepares For June 10th Legalized iGambling Referendum
04 Jun 2018
On June 10th, Switzerland will hold a national referendum to decide whether the ‘Money Gaming Act’ passed by the Swiss Parliament in September 2017 can be implemented next year in its present form. The piece of legislation paves the way for land-based casinos and local partners to offer legalized online gambling in Switzerland, although a
MGM Resorts International Buys NY's Empire City Casino for $850 Million
02 Jun 2018
Real estate and entertainment conglomerate MGM Resorts International has revealed that it’s embarking on a purchase of Empire City Casino, a slots and pari-mutuel wagering venue located in Yonkers, N.Y., just a few miles north of Manhattan. The deal was announced May 29 in a press release, and is expected to be completed near the
Delaware to Launch Full-Scale Sports Betting on June 5th
02 Jun 2018
Last month’s decision by the US Supreme Court to overturn the sports betting ban in the country has opened the floodgates for individual states to legalize and regulate sports wagering within their borders. Before its decision was even made, though, a number of states had already put in place the necessary legislation in order to